Archive for October, 2012

Oct 02 2012

Ubiquitous Human Noise


Yesterday I read a fascinating article from the University of Wisconsin describing how ecologists Stan Temple and Christopher Bocast recreated a 1940 soundscape at Aldo Leopold’s shack in Salk County, Wisconsin.  The project was amazing because they didn’t have a recording from Leopold’s time.  Instead they built it from his field notes.

Every morning Aldo Leopold listened to the birds and wrote detailed notes of the songs he heard, where he heard them, and the light levels when the birds first sang.  Using his notes, bird song recordings from the Cornell Lab of Ornithology’s Macauley Library, and newly recorded background sounds from Wisconsin, Temple and Bocast completed the soundscape.

The result is nothing like the place today.  The habitat, birds, and insects have changed and now there’s the constant hum of an interstate less than a mile away.

To get “clean” background sounds Temple and Bocast searched for a quiet place in Wisconsin.  It was very hard to find because, as Temple points out, “in the lower 48 states, there is no place more than 35 kilometers [21.7 miles] from the nearest road, making it nearly impossible to tune out the hum of human activity, even in places designated as wilderness. ”

I’m familiar with the problem.  I’m used to noise near my city home but I go to the woods to be quiet and listen to nature.  In the last 15 years I’ve noticed an increase in human-generated sounds in the woods.  It’s impossible to avoid the sound of cars, trucks, motorcycles, chain saws, leaf blowers, all-terrain vehicles and jet skis.

I don’t like it. Perhaps I’m not alone.

On Sunday I watched a flock of robins in the trees along the Bridle Trail in Schenley Park, directly above the Parkway East.  I tried to locate the birds by sound but could not hear them over the roar of the interstate.

The birds probably couldn’t hear well either. It was more than annoying. It was stressful.

I wonder what they think of ubiquitous human noise.

(photo of Aldo Leopold linked from the University of Wisconsin soundscape article, courtesy of UW Digital Archives.  Click on the image to read the article and listen to the recreated soundscape.)

 

5 responses so far

Oct 01 2012

Flying Backwards? Easy!

Published by under Bird Behavior

One of the most amazing things about hummingbirds is that they fly backwards — and they do it a lot!

Every time they feed, which is about once every two minutes, they reverse when they leave the flower.  You’ve seen them do it.  They raise their heads, seem to stand up straight, and glide backwards.

Dr. Nir Sapir wondered,  Does this posture create more drag than forward flight?  Is it harder to do than hovering?

So he and his postdoc advisor Robert Dudley used high speed cameras to observe five Anna’s hummingbirds in a wind tunnel at University of California, Berkeley.  They changed the position of the nectar source and varied the wind speed from 0 to 3 meters per second (6.7 mph) so the birds had to fly forward, hover, or fly backward while feeding.  They also used an ingenious shroud around the feeder to measure the birds’ oxygen consumption and gauge their exertion.

The results were somewhat surprising.  For a hummingbird, backward flight is just as efficient as forward and 20% more efficient than hovering.  Drag isn’t a problem because hummingbirds fly backward rather slowly.  In the wind tunnel they gave up on backward flight when the wind reached 4.5 meter per second (10 mph).

So if you ask a hummingbird about flying backward, it’s easy!

Click here for more information on this study at BBC Science News.

(photo by Marcy Cunkelman)

One response so far

« Prev

Bird Stories from OnQ